E2-9000 vs E1-1500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-1500
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.22

E2-9000 outperforms E1-1500 by a whopping 159% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking35923211
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesBristol Ridge
Power efficiency0.512.36
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date6 January 2013 (13 years ago)1 June 2016 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of E1-1500 and E2-9000: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.48 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography40 nm28 nm
Die size75 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-1500 and E2-9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallBGA
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-1500 and E2-9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VVirtualization,
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-1500 and E2-9000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-1500 and E2-9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7310AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E1-1500 0.22
E2-9000 0.57
+159%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

E1-1500 374
Samples: 219
E2-9000 978
+161%
Samples: 90

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 0.57
Integrated graphics card 0.31 0.95
Recency 6 January 2013 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 10 Watt

E2-9000 has a 159% higher aggregate performance score, 206% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The AMD E2-9000 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E1-1500 in performance tests.

Note that E1-1500 is a desktop processor while E2-9000 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 174 votes

Rate E1-1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 345 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E1-1500 and E2-9000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.