Pentium 4 2.40 vs E1-1200
Primary details
Comparing E1-1200 and Pentium 4 2.40 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Prescott (2001−2005) |
| Release date | 6 June 2012 (12 years ago) | March 2004 (20 years ago) |
| Current price | $74 | $39 |
Detailed specifications
E1-1200 and Pentium 4 2.40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 16 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 109 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 125 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on E1-1200 and Pentium 4 2.40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 | 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 110 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-1200 and Pentium 4 2.40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | DDR3-1066 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A | no data |
| PowerNow | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-1200 and Pentium 4 2.40 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-1200 and Pentium 4 2.40. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 7310 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
E1-1200 outperforms Pentium 4 2.40 by 189% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 110 Watt |
We couldn't decide between E1-1200 and Pentium 4 2.40. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E1-1200 is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 2.40 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E1-1200 and Pentium 4 2.40, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
