Core i5-1035G1 vs E1-1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-1200 and Core i5-1035G1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1198
Place by popularitynot in top-10063
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Core i5
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Ice Lake-U (2019−2020)
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)1 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$297
Current price$74 $626 (2.1x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

E1-1200 and Core i5-1035G1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm10 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E1-1200 and Core i5-1035G1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1FCBGA1526
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-1200 and Core i5-1035G1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR3-1066 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4AIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
PowerNow+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

E1-1200 and Core i5-1035G1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-1200 and Core i5-1035G1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-1200 and Core i5-1035G1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data58.3 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7310Intel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-1200 and Core i5-1035G1 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by E1-1200 and Core i5-1035G1 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data5120 x 3200@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-1200 and Core i5-1035G1 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-1200 and Core i5-1035G1.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E1-1200 379
i5-1035G1 7406
+1854%

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms E1-1200 by 1854% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

E1-1200 912
i5-1035G1 6870
+653%

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms E1-1200 by 653% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E1-1200 1682
i5-1035G1 21299
+1166%

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms E1-1200 by 1166% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

E1-1200 76
i5-1035G1 10.8
+604%

E1-1200 outperforms Core i5-1035G1 by 604% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

E1-1200 1
i5-1035G1 6
+996%

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms E1-1200 by 996% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E1-1200 0.27
i5-1035G1 1.97
+630%

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms E1-1200 by 630% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E1-1200 418
i5-1035G1 3800
+810%

Core i5-1035G1 outperforms E1-1200 by 810% in WinRAR 4.0.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 1 August 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between E1-1200 and Core i5-1035G1. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-1200 and Core i5-1035G1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-1200
E1-1200
Intel Core i5-1035G1
Core i5-1035G1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 261 vote

Rate E1-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2725 votes

Rate Core i5-1035G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-1200 or Core i5-1035G1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.