Xeon E-2334 vs E-350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E-350 and Xeon E-2334 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated854
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.13
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)8 September 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price$268 $2748

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E-350 and Xeon E-2334 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm14 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on E-350 and Xeon E-2334 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and Xeon E-2334. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR3-1066/DDR3L-1066 RAM, PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4AIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

E-350 and Xeon E-2334 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and Xeon E-2334 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and Xeon E-2334. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-350 and Xeon E-2334.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E-350 421
Xeon E-2334 12929
+2971%

Xeon E-2334 outperforms E-350 by 2971% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E-350 104
Xeon E-2334 1586
+1425%

Xeon E-2334 outperforms E-350 by 1425% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E-350 181
Xeon E-2334 5070
+2701%

Xeon E-2334 outperforms E-350 by 2701% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 8 September 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between E-350 and Xeon E-2334. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E-350 is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2334 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and Xeon E-2334, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-350
E-350
Intel Xeon E-2334
Xeon E-2334

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 374 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Xeon E-2334 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-350 or Xeon E-2334, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.