VIA C3 Processor 1.0A vs E-350
Primary details
Comparing E-350 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3153 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.38 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Ezra-T (2002) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (14 years ago) | 3 June 2002 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E-350 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 64 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 56 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on E-350 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 | 370 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2011 | 3 June 2002 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 10 Watt |
E-350 has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.
VIA C3 Processor 1.0A, on the other hand, has 80% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between E-350 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E-350 is a notebook processor while VIA C3 Processor 1.0A is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0A, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
