EPYC 9654 vs E-350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E-350 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated4
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.12
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Genoa
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current price$268 $4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E-350 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size75 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E-350 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFT1SP5
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR3-1066/DDR3L-1066 RAM, PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4Ano data
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-350 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E-350 421
EPYC 9654 122164
+28918%

EPYC 9654 outperforms E-350 by 28918% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E-350 104
EPYC 9654 1823
+1653%

EPYC 9654 outperforms E-350 by 1653% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E-350 181
EPYC 9654 18430
+10082%

EPYC 9654 outperforms E-350 by 10082% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 360 Watt

We couldn't decide between E-350 and EPYC 9654. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E-350 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-350
E-350
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 364 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 983 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-350 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.