Ryzen 3 3100 vs Duron 1600
Primary details
Comparing Duron 1600 and Ryzen 3 3100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 959 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 33.70 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Duron | Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 10.93 |
| Architecture codename | K7 (2000−2004) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 15 August 2003 (21 year ago) | 24 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Duron 1600 and Ryzen 3 3100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 266.66 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 12 | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 64 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 80.89 mm2 | 74 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 37 Million | 3,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Duron 1600 and Ryzen 3 3100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 57 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Duron 1600 and Ryzen 3 3100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Duron 1600 and Ryzen 3 3100 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Duron 1600 and Ryzen 3 3100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Duron 1600 and Ryzen 3 3100.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 August 2003 | 24 April 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 57 Watt | 65 Watt |
Duron 1600 has 14% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 3100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Duron 1600 and Ryzen 3 3100. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Duron 1600 and Ryzen 3 3100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
