Athlon MP 1900+ vs Duron 1600
Primary details
Comparing Duron 1600 and Athlon MP 1900+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Duron | AMD Athlon MP |
| Architecture codename | K7 (2000−2004) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 15 August 2003 (21 year ago) | 12 December 2001 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $319 |
Detailed specifications
Duron 1600 and Athlon MP 1900+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | FSB |
| Bus rate | 266.66 MT/s | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 12 | 12 |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 64 KB | 256 KB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 80.89 mm2 | 128 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 37 Million | 38 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Duron 1600 and Athlon MP 1900+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 57 Watt | 66 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Duron 1600 and Athlon MP 1900+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 August 2003 | 12 December 2001 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 57 Watt | 66 Watt |
Duron 1600 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 15.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Duron 1600 and Athlon MP 1900+. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Duron 1600 is a desktop processor while Athlon MP 1900+ is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Duron 1600 and Athlon MP 1900+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
