Microsoft SQ1 vs Duron 1300
Primary details
Comparing Duron 1300 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1473 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Duron | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Architecture codename | K7 (2000−2004) | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) |
| Release date | 21 January 2002 (22 years ago) | 2 October 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Duron 1300 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 200 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 13 | no data |
| L2 cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 105.68 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 25 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Duron 1300 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Duron 1300 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Qualcomm Adreno 685 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 January 2002 | 2 October 2019 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 7 nm |
Microsoft SQ1 has an age advantage of 17 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Duron 1300 and Microsoft SQ1. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Duron 1300 is a desktop processor while Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Duron 1300 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
