EPYC 7282 vs D-1513N
Primary details
Comparing D-1513N and EPYC 7282 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 298 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 14.75 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon D | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 15.13 |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 7 August 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $192 | $650 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
D-1513N and EPYC 7282 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Multiplier | 16 | 28 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | 246.24 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 3200 Million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on D-1513N and EPYC 7282 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by D-1513N and EPYC 7282. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
D-1513N and EPYC 7282 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by D-1513N and EPYC 7282 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by D-1513N and EPYC 7282. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 29.861 GB/s | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 120 Watt |
D-1513N has 242.9% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7282, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between D-1513N and EPYC 7282. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between D-1513N and EPYC 7282, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
