Core 2 Duo SU9400 vs Core m7-6Y75

Primary details

Comparing Core m7-6Y75 and Core 2 Duo SU9400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2159not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core m7Intel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency30.91no data
Architecture codenameSkylake-Y (2015)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)20 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$393$262

Detailed specifications

Core m7-6Y75 and Core 2 Duo SU9400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB3 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size98.57 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1750 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.15V

Compatibility

Information on Core m7-6Y75 and Core 2 Duo SU9400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1515BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Core 2 Duo SU9400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core m7-6Y75 and Core 2 Duo SU9400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Core 2 Duo SU9400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Core 2 Duo SU9400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 515no data
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m7-6Y75 and Core 2 Duo SU9400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Core 2 Duo SU9400 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Core 2 Duo SU9400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Core 2 Duo SU9400.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes10no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m7-6Y75 2329
+356%
Core 2 Duo SU9400 511

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

m7-6Y75 3854
+142%
Core 2 Duo SU9400 1596

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

m7-6Y75 6302
+119%
Core 2 Duo SU9400 2879

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

m7-6Y75 2730
+128%
Core 2 Duo SU9400 1197

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

m7-6Y75 19
+212%
Core 2 Duo SU9400 59.3

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

m7-6Y75 2
+198%
Core 2 Duo SU9400 1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 20 August 2008
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 10 Watt

m7-6Y75 has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core m7-6Y75 and Core 2 Duo SU9400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m7-6Y75 and Core 2 Duo SU9400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m7-6Y75
Core m7-6Y75
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400
Core 2 Duo SU9400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 33 votes

Rate Core m7-6Y75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SU9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m7-6Y75 or Core 2 Duo SU9400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.