i9-13900KF vs m5-6Y57

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m5-6Y57
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.53
Core i9-13900KF
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
37.92
+2378%

Core i9-13900KF outperforms Core m5-6Y57 by a whopping 2378% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m5-6Y57 and Core i9-13900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking211885
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data64.79
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core m5Intel Core i9
Architecture codenameSkylake-Y (2015)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)27 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core m5-6Y57 and Core i9-13900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed1.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 GT/s4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier1130
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size98.57 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core m5-6Y57 and Core i9-13900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1515FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Core i9-13900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core m5-6Y57 and Core i9-13900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Core i9-13900KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Core i9-13900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/s89.604 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 515no data
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m5-6Y57 and Core i9-13900KF integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Core i9-13900KF integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Core i9-13900KF integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Core i9-13900KF.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m5-6Y57 1.53
i9-13900KF 37.92
+2378%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m5-6Y57 2352
i9-13900KF 58467
+2386%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.53 37.92
Recency 1 September 2015 27 September 2022
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 125 Watt

m5-6Y57 has 3025% lower power consumption.

i9-13900KF, on the other hand, has a 2378.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Core i9-13900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m5-6Y57 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core m5-6Y57 is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m5-6Y57 and Core i9-13900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m5-6Y57
Core m5-6Y57
Intel Core i9-13900KF
Core i9-13900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 50 votes

Rate Core m5-6Y57 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 610 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m5-6Y57 or Core i9-13900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.