Celeron N3160 vs m5-6Y57

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m5-6Y57
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.48
+94.7%
Celeron N3160
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.76

Core m5-6Y57 outperforms Celeron N3160 by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron N3160 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21682661
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core m5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency28.0317.99
Architecture codenameSkylake-Y (2015)Braswell (2015−2016)
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)15 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$107

Detailed specifications

Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron N3160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.24 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0IDI
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size98.57 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron N3160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron N3160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Smart Response+-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron N3160 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection-+
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron N3160 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron N3160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 515Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 640 MHz)
Max video memory16 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency900 MHz640 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron N3160 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron N3160 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron N3160 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12+
OpenGL4.5+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron N3160.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes104
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m5-6Y57 1.48
+94.7%
Celeron N3160 0.76

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m5-6Y57 2349
+95.8%
Celeron N3160 1200

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 0.76
Integrated graphics card 1.64 0.62
Recency 1 September 2015 15 January 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 6 Watt

m5-6Y57 has a 94.7% higher aggregate performance score, 164.5% faster integrated GPU, and 50% lower power consumption.

Celeron N3160, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 100% more physical cores.

The Core m5-6Y57 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3160 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m5-6Y57 and Celeron N3160, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m5-6Y57
Core m5-6Y57
Intel Celeron N3160
Celeron N3160

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 53 votes

Rate Core m5-6Y57 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 195 votes

Rate Celeron N3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m5-6Y57 or Celeron N3160, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.