Ryzen 3 2300U vs m5-6Y54

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m5-6Y54
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.48
Ryzen 3 2300U
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.63
+145%

Ryzen 3 2300U outperforms Core m5-6Y54 by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 3 2300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21811524
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core m5AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency26.9922.07
Architecture codenameSkylake-Y (2015)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)8 January 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 3 2300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier1120
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size98.57 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1750 Million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 3 2300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1515FP5
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 3 2300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 3 2300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 3 2300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 3 2300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 515AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 3 2300U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 3 2300U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 3 2300U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 3 2300U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m5-6Y54 1.48
Ryzen 3 2300U 3.63
+145%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m5-6Y54 2269
Ryzen 3 2300U 5548
+145%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

m5-6Y54 2
Ryzen 3 2300U 4
+86.6%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

m5-6Y54 223
Ryzen 3 2300U 423
+89.9%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

m5-6Y54 103
+30.4%
Ryzen 3 2300U 79

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

m5-6Y54 1.1
+39.2%
Ryzen 3 2300U 0.79

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 3.63
Integrated graphics card 1.64 3.04
Recency 1 September 2015 8 January 2018
Physical cores 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 15 Watt

m5-6Y54 has 275% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 2300U, on the other hand, has a 145.3% higher aggregate performance score, 85.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% more physical cores.

The Ryzen 3 2300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m5-6Y54 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m5-6Y54 and Ryzen 3 2300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m5-6Y54
Core m5-6Y54
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
Ryzen 3 2300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 33 votes

Rate Core m5-6Y54 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 193 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m5-6Y54 or Ryzen 3 2300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.