Core i3-6006U vs Core m5-6Y54

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core m5-6Y54
2015
2 cores / 4 threads
1.47
Core i3-6006U
2016
2 cores / 4 threads
1.47

General info

Comparing Core m5-6Y54 and Core i3-6006U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20522045
Place by popularitynot in top-10086
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core m5Intel Core i3
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years ago)11 November 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$281
Current price$851 (3x MSRP)$452 (1.6x MSRP)

Technical specs

Core m5-6Y54 and Core i3-6006U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache4 MB3 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size99 mm299 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1750 Million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core m5-6Y54 and Core i3-6006U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Core i3-6006U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP--
Smart Response++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core m5-6Y54 and Core i3-6006U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Core i3-6006U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Core i3-6006U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.8 GB/s34.1 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 515Intel HD Graphics 520
Max video memory16 GB32 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency900 MHz900 MHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m5-6Y54 and Core i3-6006U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Core i3-6006U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Core i3-6006U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m5-6Y54 and Core i3-6006U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m5-6Y54 1.47
i3-6006U 1.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

m5-6Y54 2267
i3-6006U 2280
+0.6%

Core i3-6006U outperforms Core m5-6Y54 by 1% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

m5-6Y54 3962
+22.8%
i3-6006U 3227

Core m5-6Y54 outperforms Core i3-6006U by 23% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

m5-6Y54 6899
i3-6006U 7364
+6.7%

Core i3-6006U outperforms Core m5-6Y54 by 7% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

m5-6Y54 26.08
i3-6006U 24.3
+7.3%

Core m5-6Y54 outperforms Core i3-6006U by 7% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

m5-6Y54 2
i3-6006U 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

m5-6Y54 223
+3.7%
i3-6006U 215

Core m5-6Y54 outperforms Core i3-6006U by 4% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

m5-6Y54 103
+23.4%
i3-6006U 84

Core m5-6Y54 outperforms Core i3-6006U by 23% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

m5-6Y54 1.1
+14.6%
i3-6006U 0.96

Core m5-6Y54 outperforms Core i3-6006U by 15% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

m5-6Y54 1.5
+25%
i3-6006U 1.2

Core m5-6Y54 outperforms Core i3-6006U by 25% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

m5-6Y54 2111
+16.8%
i3-6006U 1808

Core m5-6Y54 outperforms Core i3-6006U by 17% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

m5-6Y54 63
i3-6006U 75
+19%

Core i3-6006U outperforms Core m5-6Y54 by 19% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

m5-6Y54 11
i3-6006U 14
+26.8%

Core i3-6006U outperforms Core m5-6Y54 by 27% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

m5-6Y54 2784
+38.4%
i3-6006U 2012

Core m5-6Y54 outperforms Core i3-6006U by 38% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

m5-6Y54 5522
+26%
i3-6006U 4384

Core m5-6Y54 outperforms Core i3-6006U by 26% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

m5-6Y54 5926
+31.7%
i3-6006U 4501

Core m5-6Y54 outperforms Core i3-6006U by 32% in Geekbench 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

m5-6Y54 6160
+28.2%
i3-6006U 4805

Core m5-6Y54 outperforms Core i3-6006U by 28% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

m5-6Y54 3352
+33.2%
i3-6006U 2516

Core m5-6Y54 outperforms Core i3-6006U by 33% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Integrated graphics card 1.36 2.15
Recency 1 September 2015 11 November 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core m5-6Y54 and Core i3-6006U. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m5-6Y54 and Core i3-6006U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m5-6Y54
Core m5-6Y54
Intel Core i3-6006U
Core i3-6006U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 30 votes

Rate Core m5-6Y54 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1221 vote

Rate Core i3-6006U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m5-6Y54 or Core i3-6006U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.