Core i5-1230U vs Core m3-8100Y

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m3-8100Y
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 5 Watt
1.85
Core i5-1230U
2022
10 cores / 12 threads, 9 Watt
7.26
+292%

i5-1230U outperforms m3-8100Y by a whopping 292% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m3-8100Y and Core i5-1230U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1905923
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore m3Intel Alder Lake-M
Architecture codenameAmber Lake-Y (2018−2021)Alder Lake-U (2022)
Release date30 August 2018 (5 years ago)23 February 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data
Current price$442 (1.6x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Core m3-8100Y and Core i5-1230U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-8100Y and Core i5-1230U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA1781
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i5-1230U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+-
SIPP-no data
Smart Response+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core m3-8100Y and Core i5-1230U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i5-1230U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i5-1230U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth33.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 615Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHz850 MHz
Execution Unitsno data80

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-8100Y and Core i5-1230U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i5-1230U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hz4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i5-1230U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i5-1230U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1014

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m3-8100Y 1.85
i5-1230U 7.26
+292%

Core i5-1230U outperforms Core m3-8100Y by 292% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

m3-8100Y 2869
i5-1230U 11233
+292%

Core i5-1230U outperforms Core m3-8100Y by 292% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

m3-8100Y 3850
i5-1230U 7290
+89.4%

Core i5-1230U outperforms Core m3-8100Y by 89% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

m3-8100Y 6055
i5-1230U 17243
+185%

Core i5-1230U outperforms Core m3-8100Y by 185% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

m3-8100Y 18.57
i5-1230U 14
+32.6%

Core m3-8100Y outperforms Core i5-1230U by 33% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

m3-8100Y 180
i5-1230U 514
+186%

Core i5-1230U outperforms Core m3-8100Y by 186% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

m3-8100Y 97
i5-1230U 187
+93.4%

Core i5-1230U outperforms Core m3-8100Y by 93% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

m3-8100Y 1646
i5-1230U 4985
+203%

Core i5-1230U outperforms Core m3-8100Y by 203% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

m3-8100Y 11
i5-1230U 42
+273%

Core i5-1230U outperforms Core m3-8100Y by 273% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

m3-8100Y 58
i5-1230U 153
+162%

Core i5-1230U outperforms Core m3-8100Y by 162% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

m3-8100Y 5446
i5-1230U 21447
+294%

Core i5-1230U outperforms Core m3-8100Y by 294% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

m3-8100Y 2702
i5-1230U 5120
+89.5%

Core i5-1230U outperforms Core m3-8100Y by 89% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.85 7.26
Recency 30 August 2018 23 February 2022
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 4 12
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 9 Watt

The Core i5-1230U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m3-8100Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-8100Y and Core i5-1230U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m3-8100Y
Core m3-8100Y
Intel Core i5-1230U
Core i5-1230U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 110 votes

Rate Core m3-8100Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 32 votes

Rate Core i5-1230U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m3-8100Y or Core i5-1230U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.