Xeon W-3275 vs Core i9-9980XE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9980XE
2018
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
18.83
Xeon W-3275
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
26.87
+42.7%

Xeon W-3275 outperforms i9-9980XE by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9980XE and Xeon W-3275 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking284161
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.367.06
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9Intel Xeon W
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date8 October 2018 (5 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,979$4,449
Current price$1180 (0.6x MSRP)$5391 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-9980XE has 18% better value for money than Xeon W-3275.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9980XE and Xeon W-3275 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads3656
Base clock speed3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache1.125 MB1.75 MB
L2 cache18 MB28 MB
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)38.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature84 °C76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9980XE and Xeon W-3275 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9980XE and Xeon W-3275. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i9-9980XE and Xeon W-3275 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9980XE and Xeon W-3275 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9980XE and Xeon W-3275. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size128 GB1 TB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9980XE and Xeon W-3275.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9980XE 18.83
Xeon W-3275 26.87
+42.7%

Xeon W-3275 outperforms Core i9-9980XE by 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-9980XE 29127
Xeon W-3275 41554
+42.7%

Xeon W-3275 outperforms Core i9-9980XE by 43% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.83 26.87
Recency 8 October 2018 3 June 2019
Physical cores 18 28
Threads 36 56
Cost $1979 $4449
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 205 Watt

The Xeon W-3275 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-9980XE in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9980XE is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3275 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9980XE and Xeon W-3275, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9980XE
Core i9-9980XE
Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 101 vote

Rate Core i9-9980XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9980XE or Xeon W-3275, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.