Xeon W-3335 vs Core i9-9900KF

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	614	173
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	15.47	29.33
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Series	Intel Core i9	no data
Architecture codename	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date	8 January 2019 (5 years ago)	29 July 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$488	no data
Current price	$343 (0.7x MSRP)	$1608

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3335 has 90% better value for money than i9-9900KF.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	8 (Octa-Core)	16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads	16	32
Base clock speed	3.6 GHz	3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	5 GHz	4 GHz
Bus support	4 × 8 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	16 MB (shared)	24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	68 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C	78 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	+
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	2
Socket	FCLGA1151	FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2	Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	+
TSX	+	+
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data
SIPP	-	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	no data	-
Status	Discontinued	Launched

Security technologies

Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	no data
MPX	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	no data
SGX	Yes with Intel® ME	-
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3335 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2666	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	128 GB	4 TB
Max memory channels	2	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	41.6 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	-	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3335.

PCIe version	3.0	4
PCI Express lanes	16	64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3335 outperforms Core i9-9900KF by 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	11.84	25.40
Recency	8 January 2019	29 July 2021
Physical cores	8	16
Threads	16	32
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	250 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---