Athlon Silver 3050GE vs i9-7980XE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7980XE
2017
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
19.30
+561%
Athlon Silver 3050GE
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.92

Core i9-7980XE outperforms Athlon Silver 3050GE by a whopping 561% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7980XE and Athlon Silver 3050GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3091663
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.70no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency10.867.75
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Dali (2020)
Release date30 May 2017 (7 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7980XE and Athlon Silver 3050GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads364
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.125 MB96K (per core)
L2 cache18 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature94 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7980XE and Athlon Silver 3050GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2066AM4
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7980XE and Athlon Silver 3050GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i9-7980XE and Athlon Silver 3050GE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7980XE and Athlon Silver 3050GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7980XE and Athlon Silver 3050GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7980XE and Athlon Silver 3050GE.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes44no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7980XE 19.30
+561%
Athlon Silver 3050GE 2.92

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-7980XE 30079
+562%
Athlon Silver 3050GE 4545

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.30 2.92
Recency 30 May 2017 21 July 2020
Physical cores 18 2
Threads 36 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 35 Watt

i9-7980XE has a 561% higher aggregate performance score, and 800% more physical cores and 800% more threads.

Athlon Silver 3050GE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 371.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-7980XE is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Silver 3050GE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7980XE and Athlon Silver 3050GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7980XE
Core i9-7980XE
AMD Athlon Silver 3050GE
Athlon Silver 3050GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 278 votes

Rate Core i9-7980XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate Athlon Silver 3050GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7980XE or Athlon Silver 3050GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.