FX-6330 vs Core i9-7920X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-7920X
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 140 Watt
15.29
+433%

i9-7920X outperforms FX-6330 by a whopping 433% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7920X and FX-6330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking4221591
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.240.89
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date10 September 2017 (6 years ago)15 December 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199no data
Current price$432 (0.4x MSRP)$76

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-7920X has 1275% better value for money than FX-6330.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7920X and FX-6330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads246
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)288 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size484 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7920X and FX-6330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2066AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7920X and FX-6330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i9-7920X and FX-6330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7920X and FX-6330 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7920X and FX-6330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7920X and FX-6330.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes44no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-7920X 15.29
+433%
FX-6330 2.87

Core i9-7920X outperforms FX-6330 by 433% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-7920X 23649
+433%
FX-6330 4433

Core i9-7920X outperforms FX-6330 by 433% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.29 2.87
Recency 10 September 2017 15 December 2015
Physical cores 12 6
Threads 24 6
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 125 Watt

The Core i9-7920X is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6330 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7920X and FX-6330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-7920X
Core i9-7920X
AMD FX-6330
FX-6330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 35 votes

Rate Core i9-7920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 37 votes

Rate FX-6330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-7920X or FX-6330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.