Pentium 4 630 vs i9-7900X
Aggregate performance score
Core i9-7900X outperforms Pentium 4 630 by a whopping 7694% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-7900X and Pentium 4 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 560 | 3262 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.90 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Core i9 (Desktop) | Pentium 4 |
| Power efficiency | 8.96 | 0.17 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Prescott 2M |
| Release date | 26 June 2017 (7 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i9-7900X and Pentium 4 630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 800 MHz |
| Multiplier | 33 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 14 MB (shared) | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 67 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.2V-1.4V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-7900X and Pentium 4 630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | Socket R4 | PLGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 84 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7900X and Pentium 4 630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core i9-7900X and Pentium 4 630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7900X and Pentium 4 630 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7900X and Pentium 4 630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7900X and Pentium 4 630.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 44 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.25 | 0.17 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 1 |
| Threads | 20 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 84 Watt |
i9-7900X has a 7694.1% higher aggregate performance score, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium 4 630, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.
The Core i9-7900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 630 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7900X and Pentium 4 630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
