A6-3600 vs Core i9-7900X

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-7900X and A6-3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	508	2308
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.74	4.96
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	Core i9 (Desktop)	no data
Architecture codename	Skylake (server) (2017−2019)	Llano (2011−2012)
Release date	30 May 2017 (7 years ago)	30 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data
Current price	$864 (0.9x MSRP)	$23

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A6-3600 has 5% better value for money than i9-7900X.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-7900X and A6-3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	10 (Deca-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	20	4
Base clock speed	3.3 GHz	2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.5 GHz	2.4 GHz
Bus support	4 × 8 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	640 KB	128 KB (per core)
L2 cache	10 MB	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	13.75 MB	0 KB
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	228 mm2
Maximum core temperature	95 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	1,178 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-7900X and A6-3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	Socket R4	FM1
Power consumption (TDP)	140 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7900X and A6-3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512	no data
AES-NI	+	no data
AVX	+	no data
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	+	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	+	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Core i9-7900X and A6-3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB

+

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7900X and A6-3600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7900X and A6-3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4	DDR3
Maximum memory size	128 GB	no data
Max memory channels	4	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	85 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	-	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

N/A

Radeon HD 6530D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7900X and A6-3600.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	44	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core i9-7900X outperforms A6-3600 by 1141% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	13.65	1.10
Recency	30 May 2017	30 June 2011
Physical cores	10	4
Threads	20	4
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	140 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7900X and A6-3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---