Ryzen 7 8700G vs i9-13980HX

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13980HX
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
29.70
+48.6%
Ryzen 7 8700G
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
19.99

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Ryzen 7 8700G by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 7 8700G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking143284
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXno data
Power efficiency51.1429.12
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-HX (2023)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$668$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 7 8700G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 7 8700G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1964AM5
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 7 8700G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, NX-Bit, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XDNA2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 7 8700G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 7 8700G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 7 8700G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics for 13th Gen Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon 780M
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.65 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 7 8700G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 7 8700G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 7 8700G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 7 8700G.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13980HX 29.70
+48.6%
Ryzen 7 8700G 19.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13980HX 47171
+48.5%
Ryzen 7 8700G 31759

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i9-13980HX 11940
+53.9%
Ryzen 7 8700G 7759

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i9-13980HX 85088
+68.3%
Ryzen 7 8700G 50560

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i9-13980HX 19734
+20.2%
Ryzen 7 8700G 16417

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i9-13980HX 3.02
Ryzen 7 8700G 2.54
+18.9%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i9-13980HX 56
+78.8%
Ryzen 7 8700G 31

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-13980HX 4717
+75.2%
Ryzen 7 8700G 2693

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-13980HX 305
+6.5%
Ryzen 7 8700G 286

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i9-13980HX 3.73
+9.7%
Ryzen 7 8700G 3.4

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i9-13980HX 18.4
+24.3%
Ryzen 7 8700G 14.8

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i9-13980HX 11438
+33.1%
Ryzen 7 8700G 8593

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i9-13980HX 198
+27.2%
Ryzen 7 8700G 156

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i9-13980HX 374
+13.2%
Ryzen 7 8700G 331

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-13980HX 20329
+61.1%
Ryzen 7 8700G 12618

Blender(-)

i9-13980HX 106
Ryzen 7 8700G 186
+75.5%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-13980HX 2099
+4.3%
Ryzen 7 8700G 2012

7-Zip Single

i9-13980HX 6972
+4.6%
Ryzen 7 8700G 6665

7-Zip

i9-13980HX 119244
+58.1%
Ryzen 7 8700G 75427

WebXPRT 3

i9-13980HX 337
+0.3%
Ryzen 7 8700G 336

CrossMark Overall

i9-13980HX 2080
+9.4%
Ryzen 7 8700G 1902

WebXPRT 4 Overall

i9-13980HX 306
+12.9%
Ryzen 7 8700G 271

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

i9-13980HX 190
Ryzen 7 8700G 300
+57.9%

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

i9-13980HX 17564
+27.8%
Ryzen 7 8700G 13741

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

i9-13980HX 2882
+6.3%
Ryzen 7 8700G 2711

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.70 19.99
Integrated graphics card 5.58 18.32
Recency 4 January 2023 8 January 2024
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 65 Watt

i9-13980HX has a 48.6% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 8700G, on the other hand, has 228.3% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Core i9-13980HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 8700G in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i9-13980HX is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 8700G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 7 8700G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13980HX
Core i9-13980HX
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Ryzen 7 8700G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 492 votes

Rate Core i9-13980HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 256 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13980HX or Ryzen 7 8700G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.