Ryzen 7 8700G vs i9-13950HX

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13950HX
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
27.38
+36.8%
Ryzen 7 8700G
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
20.02

Core i9-13950HX outperforms Ryzen 7 8700G by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13950HX and Ryzen 7 8700G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking177278
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.73
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXno data
Power efficiency47.1129.15
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-HX (2023)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$590$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13950HX and Ryzen 7 8700G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13950HX and Ryzen 7 8700G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1964AM5
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13950HX and Ryzen 7 8700G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-13950HX and Ryzen 7 8700G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13950HX and Ryzen 7 8700G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13950HX and Ryzen 7 8700G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 13th Gen Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon 780M
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.65 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-13950HX and Ryzen 7 8700G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-13950HX and Ryzen 7 8700G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-13950HX and Ryzen 7 8700G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13950HX and Ryzen 7 8700G.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13950HX 27.38
+36.8%
Ryzen 7 8700G 20.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13950HX 43496
+36.8%
Ryzen 7 8700G 31805

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i9-13950HX 11424
+47.2%
Ryzen 7 8700G 7759

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i9-13950HX 80693
+59.6%
Ryzen 7 8700G 50560

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i9-13950HX 19311
+17.6%
Ryzen 7 8700G 16417

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i9-13950HX 60
+92.2%
Ryzen 7 8700G 31

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-13950HX 4529
+68.2%
Ryzen 7 8700G 2693

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-13950HX 297
+3.8%
Ryzen 7 8700G 286

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i9-13950HX 3.57
+5%
Ryzen 7 8700G 3.4

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-13950HX 20036
+58.8%
Ryzen 7 8700G 12618

Blender(-)

i9-13950HX 111
Ryzen 7 8700G 186
+67.6%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-13950HX 2043
+1.5%
Ryzen 7 8700G 2012

7-Zip Single

i9-13950HX 6754
+1.3%
Ryzen 7 8700G 6665

7-Zip

i9-13950HX 116665
+54.7%
Ryzen 7 8700G 75427

WebXPRT 3

i9-13950HX 319
Ryzen 7 8700G 336
+5.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.38 20.02
Recency 4 January 2023 8 January 2024
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 65 Watt

i9-13950HX has a 36.8% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 8700G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Core i9-13950HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 8700G in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i9-13950HX is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 8700G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13950HX and Ryzen 7 8700G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13950HX
Core i9-13950HX
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Ryzen 7 8700G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 133 votes

Rate Core i9-13950HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 233 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13950HX or Ryzen 7 8700G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.