Ryzen 5 7600 vs i9-13700HX
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-13700HX and Ryzen 5 7600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 375 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 61 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 51.97 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Raptor Lake-HX | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 24.82 |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 14 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $229 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i9-13700HX and Ryzen 5 7600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 71 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | CCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-13700HX and Ryzen 5 7600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13700HX and Ryzen 5 7600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13700HX and Ryzen 5 7600 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13700HX and Ryzen 5 7600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-5200 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13700HX and Ryzen 5 7600.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 16 | 6 |
| Threads | 24 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
i9-13700HX has 166.7% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Ryzen 5 7600, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i9-13700HX and Ryzen 5 7600. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i9-13700HX is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 7600 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13700HX and Ryzen 5 7600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
