Ryzen Threadripper 1940 vs i9-10900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking488not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-X (2019)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date19 October 2019 (4 years ago)29 July 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads2028
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature94 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2066SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth94 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2019 29 July 2017
Physical cores 10 14
Threads 20 28
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 180 Watt

i9-10900X has an age advantage of 2 years, and 9.1% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1940, on the other hand, has 40% more physical cores and 40% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10900X
Core i9-10900X
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Ryzen Threadripper 1940

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 995 votes

Rate Core i9-10900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10900X or Ryzen Threadripper 1940, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.