Xeon Gold 6130T vs Core i9-10900F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-10900F
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
12.93
Xeon Gold 6130T
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
14.10
+9%

Xeon Gold 6130T outperforms i9-10900F by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10900F and Xeon Gold 6130T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking551486
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.173.22
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Gold
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)11 July 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,988
Current price$374 $2725 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-10900F has 557% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6130T.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900F and Xeon Gold 6130T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2032
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)1 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)22 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C92 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900F and Xeon Gold 6130T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1200FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900F and Xeon Gold 6130T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i9-10900F and Xeon Gold 6130T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900F and Xeon Gold 6130T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900F and Xeon Gold 6130T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size128 GB768 GB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900F and Xeon Gold 6130T.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-10900F 12.93
Xeon Gold 6130T 14.10
+9%

Xeon Gold 6130T outperforms Core i9-10900F by 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-10900F 20000
Xeon Gold 6130T 21804
+9%

Xeon Gold 6130T outperforms Core i9-10900F by 9% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.93 14.10
Recency 30 April 2020 11 July 2017
Physical cores 10 16
Threads 20 32
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i9-10900F and Xeon Gold 6130T.

Note that Core i9-10900F is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6130T is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900F and Xeon Gold 6130T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10900F
Core i9-10900F
Intel Xeon Gold 6130T
Xeon Gold 6130T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 311 votes

Rate Core i9-10900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 6130T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10900F or Xeon Gold 6130T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.