Celeron 585 vs i9-10900F
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-10900F and Celeron 585 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 607 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 18.27 | no data |
Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020) | no data |
Release date | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 1 July 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i9-10900F and Celeron 585 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | no data |
Threads | 20 | no data |
Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | no data |
Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 1 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
VID voltage range | no data | 0.95-1.3V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-10900F and Celeron 585 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA1200 | PPGA478 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900F and Celeron 585. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
Idle States | + | - |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core i9-10900F and Celeron 585 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | - |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900F and Celeron 585 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | - |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900F and Celeron 585. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900F and Celeron 585.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 30 April 2020 | 1 July 2008 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 31 Watt |
i9-10900F has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 585, on the other hand, has 109.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i9-10900F and Celeron 585. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i9-10900F is a desktop processor while Celeron 585 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900F and Celeron 585, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.