Ryzen 5 6600HS vs i9-10800F
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 5 6600HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 642 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | no data | 32.31 |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020) | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| Release date | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) | January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 5 6600HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | no data | 208 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 5 6600HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1200 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 5 6600HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 5 6600HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 5 6600HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 5 6600HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 660M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 5 6600HS.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 10 | 6 |
| Threads | 20 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
i9-10800F has 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.
Ryzen 5 6600HS, on the other hand, has a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 5 6600HS. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i9-10800F is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 6600HS is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10800F and Ryzen 5 6600HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
