Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 vs i7-990X

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-990X
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.44
+1010%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-57
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.40

Core i7-990X outperforms Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 by a whopping 1010% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-990X and Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13693054
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.23no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data2x Athlon 64
Power efficiency3.251.23
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Hawk-256
Release date24 February 2011 (14 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$1,104no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-990X and Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.46 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.73 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate6.4 GT/s667 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-990X and Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366no data
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-990X and Athlon 64 X2 TK-57. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-990X and Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-990X and Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-990X and Athlon 64 X2 TK-57. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-990X and Athlon 64 X2 TK-57.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i7-990X 4.44
+1010%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 0.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-990X 7120
+999%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 648

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-990X 559
+218%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 176

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-990X 2620
+732%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 315

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.44 0.40
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 31 Watt

i7-990X has a 1010% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-57, on the other hand, has 319.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-990X is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-990X is a desktop processor while Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-990X
Core i7-990X
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-57
Athlon 64 X2 TK-57

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 179 votes

Rate Core i7-990X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 22 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i7-990X and Athlon 64 X2 TK-57, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.