Celeron U3600 vs i7-9700K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-9700K
2018
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
9.10
+2428%
Celeron U3600
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.36

Core i7-9700K outperforms Celeron U3600 by a whopping 2428% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-9700K and Celeron U3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8363033
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.58no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Celeron
Power efficiency9.071.89
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date19 October 2018 (6 years ago)11 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$374no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-9700K and Celeron U3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 1.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier369
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size178 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-9700K and Celeron U3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA-1151BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9700K and Celeron U3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP+-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-9700K and Celeron U3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9700K and Celeron U3600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9700K and Celeron U3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-800
Maximum memory size128 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz500 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-9700K and Celeron U3600 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-9700K and Celeron U3600 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-9700K and Celeron U3600 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9700K and Celeron U3600.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-9700K 9.10
+2428%
Celeron U3600 0.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-9700K 14457
+2397%
Celeron U3600 579

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.10 0.36
Integrated graphics card 3.09 0.77
Recency 19 October 2018 11 January 2011
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 18 Watt

i7-9700K has a 2427.8% higher aggregate performance score, 301.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron U3600, on the other hand, has 427.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-9700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron U3600 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-9700K is a desktop processor while Celeron U3600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9700K and Celeron U3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
Intel Celeron U3600
Celeron U3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2165 votes

Rate Core i7-9700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Celeron U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-9700K or Celeron U3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.