Xeon W-3223 vs i7-9700F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-9700F
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.34
Xeon W-3223
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 160 Watt
10.70
+28.3%

Xeon W-3223 outperforms Core i7-9700F by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-9700F and Xeon W-3223 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking903726
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.6418.61
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Xeon W
Power efficiency12.146.33
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$323$749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3223 has 115% better value for money than i7-9700F.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-9700F and Xeon W-3223 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3035
L1 cache64K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)16.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C68 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-9700F and Xeon W-3223 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt160 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9700F and Xeon W-3223. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-9700F and Xeon W-3223 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9700F and Xeon W-3223 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9700F and Xeon W-3223. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size128 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9700F and Xeon W-3223.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-9700F 8.34
Xeon W-3223 10.70
+28.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-9700F 13248
Xeon W-3223 17003
+28.3%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-9700F 1577
+15%
Xeon W-3223 1371

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-9700F 6313
Xeon W-3223 8125
+28.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.34 10.70
Recency 23 April 2019 3 June 2019
Threads 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 160 Watt

i7-9700F has 146.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3223, on the other hand, has a 28.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 100% more threads.

The Xeon W-3223 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-9700F in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-9700F is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3223 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9700F and Xeon W-3223, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-9700F
Core i7-9700F
Intel Xeon W-3223
Xeon W-3223

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 670 votes

Rate Core i7-9700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3223 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-9700F or Xeon W-3223, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.