FX-6100 vs Core i7-9700E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-9700E
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.15
+242%

i7-9700E outperforms FX-6100 by a whopping 242% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-9700E and FX-6100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8721701
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.99
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)12 October 2011 (12 years ago)
Current priceno data$39

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-9700E and FX-6100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads86
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)288 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)6 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size180.3 mm2315 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-9700E and FX-6100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1151AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-9700E and FX-6100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-9700E and FX-6100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-9700E and FX-6100 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-9700E and FX-6100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-9700E and FX-6100.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-9700E 8.15
+242%
FX-6100 2.38

Core i7-9700E outperforms FX-6100 by 242% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-9700E 12600
+242%
FX-6100 3682

Core i7-9700E outperforms FX-6100 by 242% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-9700E 1569
+308%
FX-6100 385

Core i7-9700E outperforms FX-6100 by 308% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-9700E 6154
+398%
FX-6100 1235

Core i7-9700E outperforms FX-6100 by 398% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.15 2.38
Recency 23 April 2019 12 October 2011
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 8 6
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

The Core i7-9700E is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-9700E and FX-6100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-9700E
Core i7-9700E
AMD FX-6100
FX-6100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-9700E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1016 votes

Rate FX-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-9700E or FX-6100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.