Pentium M 765 vs Core i7-960

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-960 and Pentium M 765 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1778not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.01no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)Pentium M
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release dateOctober 2009 (14 years ago)October 2004 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$316no data
Current price$130 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-960 and Pentium M 765 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus support1333 MHz400 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)32 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size263 mm284 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C100 °C
Number of transistors731 million140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.988-1.356V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-960 and Pentium M 765 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-960 and Pentium M 765. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching--
PAE36 Bit32 Bit
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-960 and Pentium M 765 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-960 and Pentium M 765 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-960 and Pentium M 765. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support--

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-960 3863
+111%
Pentium M 765 1834

Core i7-960 outperforms Pentium M 765 by 111% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-960 5360
+520%
Pentium M 765 864

Core i7-960 outperforms Pentium M 765 by 520% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 7 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i7-960 and Pentium M 765. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-960 is a desktop processor while Pentium M 765 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-960 and Pentium M 765, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-960
Core i7-960
Intel Pentium M 765
Pentium M 765

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 139 votes

Rate Core i7-960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate Pentium M 765 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-960 or Pentium M 765, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.