Opteron 146 vs i7-960

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-960 and Opteron 146 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1866not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.54no data
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Release date20 October 2009 (15 years ago)September 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$316$60

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-960 and Opteron 146 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size263 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors731 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-960 and Opteron 146 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366940
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-960 and Opteron 146. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-960 and Opteron 146 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-960 and Opteron 146 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-960 and Opteron 146. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-960 and Opteron 146.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-960 3347
+867%
Opteron 146 346

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 89 Watt

i7-960 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 146, on the other hand, has 46.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-960 and Opteron 146. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-960 is a desktop processor while Opteron 146 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-960 and Opteron 146, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-960
Core i7-960
AMD Opteron 146
Opteron 146

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 143 votes

Rate Core i7-960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Opteron 146 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-960 or Opteron 146, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.