EPYC 7H12 vs Core i7-940XM

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-940XM and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2117	37
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	21.96
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Core i7	AMD EPYC
Architecture codename	Clarksfield (2009−2010)	Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date	20 June 2010 (13 years ago)	18 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,096	no data
Current price	$200 (0.2x MSRP)	$1970

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-940XM and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads	8	128
Base clock speed	2.13 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.33 GHz	3.3 GHz
Bus support	2500 MHz	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	96K (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	8 MB (shared)	256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	45 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Die size	296 mm2	192 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	774 million	4,800 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	Yes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-940XM and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	2 (Multiprocessor)
Socket	FCPGA988,PGA988	TR4
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-940XM and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	+	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Core i7-940XM and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-940XM and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-940XM and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333	DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size	8 GB	4 TiB
Max memory channels	2	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	21 GB/s	204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

None

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-940XM and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version	2	no data
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Core i7-940XM by 3093% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.41	45.02
Recency	20 June 2010	18 September 2019
Physical cores	4	64
Threads	8	128
Chip lithography	45 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	280 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-940XM and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---