Celeron N2807 vs Core i7-940XM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-940XM and Celeron N2807 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2121not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Celeron
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date20 June 2010 (14 years ago)23 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,096$107
Current price$200 (0.2x MSRP)$251 (2.3x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-940XM and Celeron N2807 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.13 GHz1.58 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz2.16 GHz
Bus support2500 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size296 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors774 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-940XM and Celeron N2807 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt4.3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-940XM and Celeron N2807. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI--
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Smart Connectno data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-940XM and Celeron N2807 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-940XM and Celeron N2807 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-940XM and Celeron N2807. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-940XM and Celeron N2807 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-940XM and Celeron N2807.

PCIe version22.0
PCI Express lanes164
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-940XM 2187
+333%
Celeron N2807 505

Core i7-940XM outperforms Celeron N2807 by 333% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-940XM 389
+174%
Celeron N2807 142

Core i7-940XM outperforms Celeron N2807 by 174% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-940XM 1073
+347%
Celeron N2807 240

Core i7-940XM outperforms Celeron N2807 by 347% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-940XM 3630
+268%
Celeron N2807 986

Core i7-940XM outperforms Celeron N2807 by 268% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-940XM 11391
+444%
Celeron N2807 2093

Core i7-940XM outperforms Celeron N2807 by 444% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-940XM 25.18
+128%
Celeron N2807 57.4

Celeron N2807 outperforms Core i7-940XM by 128% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-940XM 4
+613%
Celeron N2807 1

Core i7-940XM outperforms Celeron N2807 by 613% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2010 23 February 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Cost $1096 $107
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 4 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i7-940XM and Celeron N2807. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-940XM and Celeron N2807, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-940XM
Core i7-940XM
Intel Celeron N2807
Celeron N2807

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 58 votes

Rate Core i7-940XM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 33 votes

Rate Celeron N2807 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-940XM or Celeron N2807, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.