Pentium G4500T vs i7-940

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-940
2008
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.93
+22.9%

Core i7-940 outperforms Pentium G4500T by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-940 and Pentium G4500T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19642110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.240.10
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)Intel Pentium (Desktop)
Power efficiency1.354.08
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release dateNovember 2008 (15 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-940 has 140% better value for money than Pentium G4500T.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-940 and Pentium G4500T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.93 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate1333 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size263 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors731 million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-940 and Pentium G4500T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-940 and Pentium G4500T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-940 and Pentium G4500T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-940 and Pentium G4500T are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-940 and Pentium G4500T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size24 GB64 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 530
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data950 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-940 and Pentium G4500T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-940 and Pentium G4500T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-940 and Pentium G4500T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-940 and Pentium G4500T.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-940 1.93
+22.9%
Pentium G4500T 1.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-940 2947
+22.8%
Pentium G4500T 2399

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-940 3550
Pentium G4500T 4828
+36%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-940 13888
+50.9%
Pentium G4500T 9206

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-940 5054
+41.1%
Pentium G4500T 3583

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-940 13.4
+61.9%
Pentium G4500T 21.7

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-940 5
+74.1%
Pentium G4500T 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.93 1.57
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

i7-940 has a 22.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Pentium G4500T, on the other hand, has a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 271.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-940 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G4500T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-940 and Pentium G4500T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-940
Core i7-940
Intel Pentium G4500T
Pentium G4500T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 24 votes

Rate Core i7-940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 6 votes

Rate Pentium G4500T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-940 or Pentium G4500T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.