Xeon W-3275M vs i7-8700B

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-8700B
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
7.47
Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.02
+235%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Core i7-8700B by a whopping 235% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-8700B and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking965197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.455.02
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Xeon W
Power efficiency10.8811.55
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date3 April 2018 (6 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$303$7,453

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-8700B has 9% better value for money than Xeon W-3275M.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-8700B and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads1256
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3225
L1 cache64K (per core)1.75 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)28 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)38.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size154 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-8700B and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1440FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8700B and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-8700B and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8700B and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8700B and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size64 GB2 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-8700B and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-8700B and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-8700B and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8700B and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-8700B 7.47
Xeon W-3275M 25.02
+235%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-8700B 11862
Xeon W-3275M 39736
+235%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-8700B 1501
+23.1%
Xeon W-3275M 1219

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-8700B 5776
Xeon W-3275M 12239
+112%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.47 25.02
Recency 3 April 2018 3 June 2019
Physical cores 6 28
Threads 12 56
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 205 Watt

i7-8700B has 215.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3275M, on the other hand, has a 234.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 366.7% more physical cores and 366.7% more threads.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-8700B in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-8700B is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8700B and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-8700B
Core i7-8700B
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 29 votes

Rate Core i7-8700B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-8700B or Xeon W-3275M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.