i7-680UM vs i7-840QM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-840QM
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.23
+64%
Core i7-680UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.75

Core i7-840QM outperforms Core i7-680UM by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-840QM and Core i7-680UM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23082646
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i7
Power efficiency2.593.94
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date20 June 2010 (14 years ago)26 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$568$317

Detailed specifications

Core i7-840QM and Core i7-680UM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed1.86 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.53 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0DMI 1.0
Bus rate2.5 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier1411
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size296 mm281+144 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors774 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-840QM and Core i7-680UM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-840QM and Core i7-680UM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology++
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-840QM and Core i7-680UM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-840QM and Core i7-680UM are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-840QM and Core i7-680UM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-840QM and Core i7-680UM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-840QM and Core i7-680UM.

PCIe version22.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-840QM 1.23
+64%
i7-680UM 0.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-840QM 1952
+63.2%
i7-680UM 1196

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 0.75
Recency 20 June 2010 26 September 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 18 Watt

i7-840QM has a 64% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i7-680UM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-840QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-680UM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-840QM and Core i7-680UM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-840QM
Core i7-840QM
Intel Core i7-680UM
Core i7-680UM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 80 votes

Rate Core i7-840QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate Core i7-680UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-840QM or Core i7-680UM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.