Atom Z670 vs i7-820QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-820QM and Atom Z670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2390not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Atom
Power efficiency2.35no data
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Lincroft (2010−2011)
Release date24 June 2009 (15 years ago)11 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$546$75

Detailed specifications

Core i7-820QM and Atom Z670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads82
Base clock speed1.73 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.06 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0cDMI
Bus rate2.5 GT/s400 MT/s
Multiplier138
L1 cache256 KB56 KB
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size296 mm265 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors774 million140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-820QM and Atom Z670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988T-PBGA518
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-820QM and Atom Z670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-820QM and Atom Z670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-820QM and Atom Z670 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-820QM and Atom Z670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR2
Maximum memory size8 GB2.93 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s3.2 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNonePowerVR SGX535

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-820QM and Atom Z670 integrated GPUs.

LVDSno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-820QM and Atom Z670.

PCIe version2no data
PCI Express lanes16no data
PCI supportno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-820QM 1775
+1023%
Atom Z670 158

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-820QM 3272
+558%
Atom Z670 497

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-820QM 8559
+1028%
Atom Z670 759

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-820QM 42.04
+259%
Atom Z670 151

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-820QM 3
+1245%
Atom Z670 0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 June 2009 11 April 2011
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 3 Watt

i7-820QM has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Atom Z670, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-820QM and Atom Z670. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-820QM and Atom Z670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-820QM
Core i7-820QM
Intel Atom Z670
Atom Z670

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 48 votes

Rate Core i7-820QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Atom Z670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-820QM or Atom Z670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.