A4-6320 vs i7-740QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-740QM
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.20
+20%

Core i7-740QM outperforms A4-6320 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-740QM and A4-6320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23652482
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency2.431.40
Architecture codenameClarksfield (2009−2010)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date22 June 2010 (14 years ago)December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$546no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-740QM and A4-6320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed1.73 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier13no data
L1 cache256 KB96 KB
L2 cache1 MB1024 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size296 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors774 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-740QM and A4-6320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988FM2
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-740QM and A4-6320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Core i7-740QM and A4-6320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-740QM and A4-6320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-740QM and A4-6320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardNoneAMD Radeon™ HD 8370D
Number of pipelinesno data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-740QM and A4-6320 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-740QM and A4-6320 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-740QM and A4-6320.

PCIe version22.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-740QM 1.20
+20%
A4-6320 1.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-740QM 1831
+19.7%
A4-6320 1530

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 1.00
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

i7-740QM has a 20% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

A4-6320, on the other hand, has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-740QM is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-6320 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-740QM is a notebook processor while A4-6320 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-740QM and A4-6320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-740QM
Core i7-740QM
AMD A4-6320
A4-6320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 156 votes

Rate Core i7-740QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate A4-6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-740QM or A4-6320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.