Celeron G1820 vs Core i7-720QM
Aggregate performance score
Celeron G1820 outperforms i7-720QM by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-720QM and Celeron G1820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2324 | 2304 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.25 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Clarksfield (2009−2010) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| Release date | 23 September 2009 (14 years ago) | 1 December 2013 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $546 | $110 |
| Current price | $418 (0.8x MSRP) | $45 (0.4x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-720QM and Celeron G1820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Bus support | 2500 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 296 mm2 | 177 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 774 million | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-720QM and Celeron G1820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCPGA988,PGA988 | FCLGA1150 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 53 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-720QM and Celeron G1820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | - | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | no data | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| SIPP | no data | - |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Core i7-720QM and Celeron G1820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-720QM and Celeron G1820 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-720QM and Celeron G1820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | 21.3 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | None | Intel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors |
| Max video memory | no data | 1.7 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.05 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-720QM and Celeron G1820 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | no data | + |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| DVI | no data | + |
| VGA | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-720QM and Celeron G1820 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 1920x1080@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 2560x1600@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 2560x1600@60Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | no data | 1920x1200@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-720QM and Celeron G1820 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 11.1/12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-720QM and Celeron G1820.
| PCIe version | 2 | Up to 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Celeron G1820 outperforms Core i7-720QM by 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Celeron G1820 outperforms Core i7-720QM by 3% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron G1820 outperforms Core i7-720QM by 50% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-720QM outperforms Celeron G1820 by 7% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.07 | 1.10 |
| Recency | 23 September 2009 | 1 December 2013 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Cost | $546 | $110 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 53 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-720QM and Celeron G1820.
Be aware that Core i7-720QM is a notebook processor while Celeron G1820 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-720QM and Celeron G1820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
