Xeon Gold 6530 vs i7-6950X

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6950X
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 140 Watt
11.30
Xeon Gold 6530
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
42.64
+277%

Xeon Gold 6530 outperforms Core i7-6950X by a whopping 277% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6950X and Xeon Gold 6530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking70760
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.8556.07
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency7.3914.46
Architecture codenameBroadwell-E (2016)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723$2,128

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6530 has 6496% better value for money than i7-6950X.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6950X and Xeon Gold 6530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads2064
Base clock speed3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/s / QPIno data
L1 cache32K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB (shared)160 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size246 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C74 °C
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6950X and Xeon Gold 6530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6950X and Xeon Gold 6530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-6950X and Xeon Gold 6530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6950X and Xeon Gold 6530 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6950X and Xeon Gold 6530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TB
Max memory channels48
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6950X and Xeon Gold 6530.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6950X 11.30
Xeon Gold 6530 42.64
+277%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6950X 17374
Xeon Gold 6530 65533
+277%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.30 42.64
Recency 31 May 2016 14 December 2023
Physical cores 10 32
Threads 20 64
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 270 Watt

i7-6950X has 92.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6530, on the other hand, has a 277.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 220% more physical cores and 220% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6530 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-6950X in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-6950X is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6530 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6950X and Xeon Gold 6530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6950X
Core i7-6950X
Intel Xeon Gold 6530
Xeon Gold 6530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 253 votes

Rate Core i7-6950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6950X or Xeon Gold 6530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.