Xeon E3-1578L v5 vs i7-6820EQ
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon E3-1578L v5 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1328 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.58 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | Intel Xeon E3 |
| Power efficiency | 9.26 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Skylake-H (2015−2016) |
| Release date | 12 October 2015 (9 years ago) | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $378 | $449 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon E3-1578L v5 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 28 | 20 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 122 mm2 | 171 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 2,300 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon E3-1578L v5 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 1440 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon E3-1578L v5. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon E3-1578L v5 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon E3-1578L v5 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon E3-1578L v5. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3-1866 | LPDDR3-1866 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | 34.134 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon E3-1578L v5.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 2.59 | 5.23 |
| Recency | 12 October 2015 | 31 May 2016 |
Xeon E3-1578L v5 has 101.9% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 7 months.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon E3-1578L v5. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i7-6820EQ is a notebook processor while Xeon E3-1578L v5 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6820EQ and Xeon E3-1578L v5, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
