Celeron M 390 vs i7-6820EQ
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-6820EQ outperforms Celeron M 390 by a whopping 2221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-6820EQ and Celeron M 390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1334 | 3241 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.62 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 9.27 | 0.86 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 12 October 2015 (9 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $378 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-6820EQ and Celeron M 390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 400 MHz |
| Multiplier | 28 | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 122 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.004V-1.292V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-6820EQ and Celeron M 390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | no data | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Celeron M 390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-6820EQ and Celeron M 390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Celeron M 390 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Celeron M 390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3-1866 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 530 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Celeron M 390.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.41 | 0.19 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 21 Watt |
i7-6820EQ has a 2221.1% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 390, on the other hand, has 114.3% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-6820EQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 390 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6820EQ and Celeron M 390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
