Atom x5-Z8300 vs Core i7-6820EQ
Aggregate performance score
i7-6820EQ outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by a whopping 755% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-6820EQ and Atom x5-Z8300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1253 | 2754 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.09 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | 5x Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Cherry Trail (2016) |
| Release date | 12 October 2015 (8 years ago) | 2 March 2015 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $378 | no data |
| Current price | $2806 (7.4x MSRP) | $197 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-6820EQ and Atom x5-Z8300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.44 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.84 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 122 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-6820EQ and Atom x5-Z8300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | UTFCBGA592 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Atom x5-Z8300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | no data |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | no data |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Core i7-6820EQ and Atom x5-Z8300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Atom x5-Z8300 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Atom x5-Z8300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3-1866 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | 12.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel HD Graphics |
| Max video memory | no data | 2 GB |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 500 MHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-6820EQ and Atom x5-Z8300 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Atom x5-Z8300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 1920x1080 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Atom x5-Z8300.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 1 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-6820EQ outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by 755% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-6820EQ outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by 760% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-6820EQ outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by 552% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-6820EQ outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by 845% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.53 | 0.53 |
| Recency | 12 October 2015 | 2 March 2015 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
The Core i7-6820EQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8300 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6820EQ and Atom x5-Z8300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
