Athlon 64 FX-76 vs i7-6820EQ
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-6820EQ and Athlon 64 FX-76 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1334 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.65 | no data |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
Power efficiency | 9.27 | no data |
Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
Release date | 12 October 2015 (9 years ago) | November 2006 (18 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $378 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-6820EQ and Athlon 64 FX-76 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 28 | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 122 mm2 | 235 mm2 |
Number of transistors | no data | 227 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-6820EQ and Athlon 64 FX-76 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | no data | F |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Athlon 64 FX-76. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-6820EQ and Athlon 64 FX-76 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Athlon 64 FX-76 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Athlon 64 FX-76. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | LPDDR3-1866 | DDR1 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 530 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6820EQ and Athlon 64 FX-76.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 125 Watt |
i7-6820EQ has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 177.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-6820EQ and Athlon 64 FX-76. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i7-6820EQ is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 FX-76 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6820EQ and Athlon 64 FX-76, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.