Xeon D-1527 vs Core i7-6700TE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6700TE
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
3.97
+17.8%

i7-6700TE outperforms Xeon D-1527 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6700TE and Xeon D-1527 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13631495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.140.08
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Xeon D
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date19 October 2015 (8 years ago)1 November 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$303$213
Current price$1384 (4.6x MSRP)$3299 (15.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-6700TE has 75% better value for money than Xeon D-1527.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6700TE and Xeon D-1527 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)1.5 MB (per core)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size122 mm2246.24 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6700TE and Xeon D-1527 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socket1151FCBGA1667
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6700TE and Xeon D-1527. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPP+no data
GPIOno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Core i7-6700TE and Xeon D-1527 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6700TE and Xeon D-1527 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6700TE and Xeon D-1527. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s34.124 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 530no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6700TE and Xeon D-1527.

PCIe version3.02.0/3.0
PCI Express lanes1632
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data6
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data+
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6700TE 3.97
+17.8%
Xeon D-1527 3.37

Core i7-6700TE outperforms Xeon D-1527 by 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-6700TE 6135
+17.7%
Xeon D-1527 5213

Core i7-6700TE outperforms Xeon D-1527 by 18% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.97 3.37
Recency 19 October 2015 1 November 2015
Cost $303 $213

The Core i7-6700TE is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1527 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-6700TE is a desktop processor while Xeon D-1527 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6700TE and Xeon D-1527, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6700TE
Core i7-6700TE
Intel Xeon D-1527
Xeon D-1527

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5 votes

Rate Core i7-6700TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate Xeon D-1527 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6700TE or Xeon D-1527, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.