Xeon Platinum 8280 vs i7-6700K

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6700K
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 91 Watt
5.62
Xeon Platinum 8280
2018
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
20.64
+267%

Xeon Platinum 8280 outperforms Core i7-6700K by a whopping 267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6700K and Xeon Platinum 8280 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1137264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.061.66
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Intel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency5.849.53
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
Release date5 August 2015 (9 years ago)11 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$339$10,009

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8280 has 57% better value for money than i7-6700K.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6700K and Xeon Platinum 8280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads856
Base clock speed4 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier4027
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)38.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size122 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data84 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)64 °Cno data
Number of transistors1750 Million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6700K and Xeon Platinum 8280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)8 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)91 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6700K and Xeon Platinum 8280. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-6700K and Xeon Platinum 8280 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6700K and Xeon Platinum 8280 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6700K and Xeon Platinum 8280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size64 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 530N/A
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-6700K and Xeon Platinum 8280 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-6700K and Xeon Platinum 8280 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-6700K and Xeon Platinum 8280 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6700K and Xeon Platinum 8280.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6700K 5.62
Xeon Platinum 8280 20.64
+267%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6700K 8934
Xeon Platinum 8280 32781
+267%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.62 20.64
Recency 5 August 2015 11 December 2018
Physical cores 4 28
Threads 8 56
Power consumption (TDP) 91 Watt 205 Watt

i7-6700K has 125.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8280, on the other hand, has a 267.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8280 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-6700K in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-6700K is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8280 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6700K and Xeon Platinum 8280, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6700K
Core i7-6700K
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
Xeon Platinum 8280

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1640 votes

Rate Core i7-6700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 124 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6700K or Xeon Platinum 8280, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.